On the Correlation Between Right-Wing Authoritarianism and Social Dominance Orientation

By Michele Roccato, L. Ricolfi. 2005

111 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/19e2437a52f5d88fe6fc2313f0e8c04a2f53dceb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Right-Wing Authoritarianism and Social Dominance Orientation: Their Roots in Big-Five Personality Fa (2006, background): “Thus, the fairly high correlation that has been obtained between RWA and SDO, at least in Europe and Australia (e.g., Roccato & Ricolfi, 2005), seems to be a result of the fact that they are both linked to several, and partly the same, facets of Openness to Experience.”
Right–Wing Authoritarianism and Social Dominance Orientation Differentially Moderate Intergroup Effects on Prejudice (2010, background): “Research on RWA and SDO has indicated that they seem to be relatively independent dimensions, with the correlation between them typically being positive but weak, although it can vary from strong positive to weak negative (Duriez, Van Hiel, & Kossowska, 2005; Roccato & Ricolfi, 2005).”
A Dual-Process Motivational Model of Ideology, Politics, and Prejudice (2009, background): “Third, whereaes some studies, notably in Western Europe, have reported strong positive correlations between RWA and SDO, most research, particularly in North America, has found weak positive or nonsignificant correlations (see the review and meta-analysis by Roccato & Ricolfi, 2005).”
The Aggression-Submission-Conventionalism Scale: Testing a New Three Factor Measure of Authoritarianism (2016, unknown): “…Moschner, et al., 2005; Dunwoody, Plane, Trescher, & Rice, 2014; McFarland, 2005; Pratto, Sidanius, Stallworth, & Malle, 1994; Thomsen, Green, & Sidanius, 2008), a measure of SDOwas included (but see Roccato & Ricolfi, 2005, for a review and limitations on the correlation between RWA and SDO).”
Cognitive ability and authoritarianism: Understanding support for Trump and Clinton (2017, background): “Factors including the strength of ideological contrast of a particular context affect the strength of the association between RWAand SDO (Roccato & Ricolfi, 2005).”
Common Ideological Roots of Speciesism and Generalized Ethnic Prejudice: The Social Dominance Human–Animal Relations Model (SD–HARM) (2016, background): “…interest, knowledge, and awareness, all of which have been shown to play a role in the strength of the associations between ideological variables such as RWA and SDO (e.g. Leone, Desimoni, & Chirumbolo, 2014; Roccato & Ricolfi, 2005), with implications for the predictive value of RWA and SDO.”