Foreign direct investment, diversification and firm performance

By John A. Doukas, Larry H. P. Lang. 2003

240 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d9197f5e209de2bc3c950e8426642bc525399e78

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

1. Nigel Driffield
2. O. B. Kan
3. M. Wiersema
4. H. P. Bowen
5. C. Jones
6. John A. Doukas
7. S. Bhaumik
8. S. Pal

In Strategy and Management

1. H. P. Bowen
2. M. Wiersema
3. C. Jones
4. S. Bhaumik
5. S. Pal
6. Nigel Driffield
7. John Crotty
8. O. B. Kan

Citations in the corpus

• International Diversification: Antecedents, Outcomes, and Moderators (2006, unknown): “Doukas and Lang (2003) sought to explain the inconsistent results by noting that product diversification has a strong interactive effect when firms diversify internationally outside their core business but that the interaction is less strong for core international diversification.”
• Does ownership structure of emerging-market firms affect their outward FDI? The case of the Indian automotive and pharmaceutical sectors (2010, background): “In the absence of significant literature on the causal link between ownership patterns and outward FDI in the IB literature – Gallo and Sven (1991), Doukas and Lang (2003), and Lien et al. (2005) are important exceptions, we draw from relevant literature in related disciplines to develop plausible…”
• Globalfocusing: From Domestic Conglomerates to Global Specialists* (2006, unknown): “internationalisation and diversification (Hitt et al. 1997; Qian, 2002; Doukas and Lang, 2003 ), yet their”
• International business research and risky investments, an analysis of FDI in conflict zones (2013, background): “This offers an extension of Doukas and Lang (2003) who highlight the importance of ownership structures in explaining FDI, through this in terms of the risks associated with FDI, and the returns to “external” shareholders.”
• Does global diversification destroy firm value? (2006, result): “to be consistent with the global diversification literature (e.g., Caves, 1971; Buckley and Casson, 1976; Dunning, 1973) predicting a positive relation between firm value and foreign investment and several studies documenting benefits to global diversification (e.g., Errunza and Senbet, 1981, 1984; ”
• Corporate diversification: the impact of foreign competition, industry globalization, and product diversification (2008, background): “…performance implications (Bergsten, Horst, and Moran, 1978; Buhner, 1987; Capar and Kotabe, 2003; Denis, and Yost, 2002; Delios and Beamish, 1999; Doukas and Lang, 2003; Geringer, Tallman, and Olsen, 2000; Geringer, Beamish, and daCosta, 1989; Goerzen and Beamish, 2003; Grant, Jammine, and…”
• The relationship between international diversification and firm performance: Why it remains a puzzle (2011, unknown): “J., 1: 152–170 (2011) DOI: 10.1111/j.2042-5805.2011.00005.x (Doukas and Lang, 2003; Delios and Beamish, 1999).”