Emotional arousal and gender differences in aggression: A meta‐analysis

By G. Knight, Ivanna K. Guthrie, Melanie C. Page, Richard A. Fabes. 2002

178 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The Proof is in the Punch: Gender Differences in Perceptions of Action and Aggression as Components of Manhood (2010, background): “college undergraduates—documents men’ sm ore frequent use of physical aggression in general (e.g., Bettencourt and Miller 1996; Eagly and Steffen 1986 ;H yde1984; Knight et al. 2002 ).”
Revisiting gender differences: What we know and what lies ahead☆ (2015, unknown): “Regarding assertive behavior, findings show that males behave more aggressively than females (Card, Stucky, Sawalani, & Little, 2008; Knight et al., 2002).”
Sex Differences in Aggression in Real-World Settings: A Meta-Analytic Review (2004, background): “Although higher status does not necessarily mean more aggression, especially its physical form, the pursuit and maintenance of high-status positions may require and facilitate more verbal and indirect aggression.”
Emotion dysregulation, negative affect, and aggression: A moderated, multiple mediator analysis (2014, result): “Findings are consistent with prior research showing a relationship between negative affect and aggression as well as research demonstrating sex differences in this association (Knight et al., 2002).”