Using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) to screen for child psychiatric disorders in a community sample
By Robert Goodman, Tamsin Ford, Helen A. Simmons, Rebecca Gatward, H. Meltzer. International Review of Psychiatry, 2003
1,713 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Education, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d8b0aad77f56c47f48e3847e731254df5d998f61
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
- T. Zazryn
- Amy M. Hamilton
- Rutger C. M. E. Engels
- Janet Etty-Leal
- Ad A. Vermulst
- R. Otten
- J. Janssens
- S. Brinkman
In Education
- Rutger C. M. E. Engels
- Ad A. Vermulst
- R. Otten
- J. Janssens
- S. Brinkman
- Lisanne L. Stone
- A. Joyce
- D. Lawrence
Citations in the corpus
- Psychometric Properties of the Parent and Teacher Versions of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire for 4- to 12-Year-Olds: A Review (2010, methodology): “Having multiple informants reporting on the SDQ is valuable because psychosocial problems may be highly situational (Achenbach et al. 1987; Goodman et al. 2000c).”
- Exploring a Mindfulness Meditation Program on the Mental Health of Upper Primary Children: A Pilot Study (2010, methodology): “The most common disorder reported in the Australian survey was attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) at 11%, with depression and conduct disorder both at three per cent (Sawyer et al, 2001).”
- Investigating the Validity of the Australian Early Development Index (2007, methodology): “Originally developed as a screening tool, the SDQ is also increasingly being used as an individual outcome measure in clinical and preventive interventions (Goodman, 1999; Goodman et al., 2000; Hawes & Dadds, 2004).”