Investigating the Validity of the Australian Early Development Index
By S. Brinkman, S. Silburn, D. Lawrence, S. Goldfeld, M. Sayers, F. Oberklaid. 2007
146 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Education, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9c7af1bea2c7182bd6d69799606c1628d490fc2e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
In Education
Citations in the corpus
- Validity and Psychometric Properties of the Early Development Instrument in Canada, Australia, United States, and Jamaica (2011, background): “Associations of the EDI and SDQ have also been reported (Brinkman et al. 2007).”
- Associations Between the Early Development Instrument at Age 5, and Reading and Numeracy Skills at Ages 8, 10 and 12: a Prospective Linked Data Study (2013, background): “In 2004 Australian Government funding enabled further instrument validation and communities from across Australia to become involved (Brinkman et al. 2007; Goldfeld et al. 2009).”
- Measuring early childhood development at a global scale: Evidence from the Caregiver-Reported Early Development Instruments (2018, background): “The EDI has also been adapted and applied or population-level use in a variety of other countries, includng Australia, the United States, Indonesia, China, Peru, Brazil, and amaica (Brinkman et al., 2007; Brinkman et al., 2016; Ip et al., 2013; anus, Brinkman, & Duku, 2011; Janus et al., 2014).”