An extended TOPSIS for determining weights of decision makers with interval numbers

By Zhongliang Yue. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2011

347 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Management Science and Operations Research, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e2efb8326504f34c07d0fefde07180c49d150267

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

1. Peide Liu
2. Fang Jin
3. Yong Deng
4. Zeshui Xu
5. Xiaolu Zhang
6. Joshua Ignatius
7. S. Khanmohammadi Otaghsara
8. Morteza Yazdani

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. Peide Liu
2. Xiaolu Zhang
3. Zeshui Xu
4. Fang Jin
5. Peng Wang
6. Xindong Peng
7. Yong Deng
8. Joshua Ignatius

In Statistics and Probability

1. Peide Liu
2. Xiaolu Zhang
3. Fang Jin
4. Yong Deng
5. Zeshui Xu
6. Joshua Ignatius
7. S. Khanmohammadi Otaghsara
8. Morteza Yazdani

Citations in the corpus

• A novel hybrid MCDM model combining the SAW, TOPSIS and GRA methods based on experimental design (2016, methodology): “The TOPSIS method introduces two ‘‘reference” points: a positive ideal solution and a negative ideal solution [52].”
• Hesitant fuzzy multi-attribute decision making based on TOPSIS with incomplete weight information (2013, methodology): “Many methods for MADM, such as the TOPSIS method [16] [17] [18], the maximizing deviation method [19] [20] [21], the gray relational analysis method [22], the VIKOR (VlseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje) method [23] [24] [25], the PROMETHEE (Preference Ranking Organisation METHod…”
• A state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications (2012, methodology): “Yue (2011) developed a method to determine decision makers' weights under a group decision environment described in an air quality assessment in Guangzhou during 16th Asian Olympic.”
• Methods for aggregating intuitionistic uncertain linguistic variables and their application to group decision making (2012, methodology): “Many ranking methods of MADM, such as the TOPSIS method [14,17,40,51], the grey relational analysis method [23,43], the VIKOR method [19,25– 27], the PROMETHEE method [6,24], and the ELECTRE method [21,29,30], have been extended to fit different attribute types, such as interval numbers, triangular ”
• A Threat Assessment Model under Uncertain Environment (2015, background): “Recently, it has been suggested to use interval numbers to represent the uncertainty or probability resulting from instinct of the incomplete knowledge or cognition [44–46].”