Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method: A robust approach
By Seyed Jafar Sadjadi, Mahdi Karimi. 2018
220 citations recorded by the source corpus.
. 2018 by the authors; licensee Growing Science, Canada ©
Subfields: Management Science and Operations Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7e9334ed6dc4a19167f2283dce48a9228b7be64f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Management Science and Operations Research
- Himanshu Gupta
- Simonov Kusi‐Sarpong
- Mehdi Rajabi Asadabadi
- Omar Khadeer Hussain
- Huiru Zhao
- Haoran Zhao
- Morteza Saberi
- Joseph Sarkis
Citations in the corpus
- Comprehensive benefit evaluation of eco-industrial parks by employing the best-worst method based on circular economy and sustainability (2018, background): “The BWM is composed of five steps (Rezaei 2015a, b).”
- A supply chain sustainability innovation framework and evaluation methodology (2018, methodology): “A novel multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) model called the ‘best-worst method’ (BWM) (Rezaei, 2015; 2016) is utilized to aid in this investigation.”
- ZBWM: The Z-number extension of Best Worst Method and its application for supplier development (2018, methodology): “Eight criteria for capabilities dimension and four criteria for willingness dimension proposed by Rezaei (2015) are shown in Tables 6 and 7.”