Studying configurations with qualitative comparative analysis: Best practices in strategy and organization research

By Thomas Greckhamer, Santi Furnari, Peer C. Fiss, Ruth V. Aguilera. Strategic Organization, 2018

1,168 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Qualitative comparative analysis is increasingly applied in strategy and organization research. The main purpose of our essay is to support this growing community of qualitative comparative analysis scholars by identifying best practices that can help guide researchers through the key stages of a qualitative comparative analysis empirical study (model building, sampling, calibration, data analysis, reporting, and interpretation of findings) and by providing examples of such practices drawn from strategy and organization studies. Coupled with this main purpose, we respond to Miller’s essay on configuration research by highlighting our points of agreement regarding his recommendations for configurational research and by addressing some of his concerns regarding qualitative comparative analysis. Our article thus contributes to configurational research by articulating how to leverage qualitative comparative analysis for enriching configurational theories of strategy and organization.

Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d7ca042283af3a32473c1fa327cc2b9ecc0e4c4a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

  1. E. Douglas
  2. Catherine Prentice

In Sociology and Political Science

  1. E. Douglas
  2. Catherine Prentice

In Strategy and Management

  1. E. Douglas
  2. Catherine Prentice

Citations in the corpus