Official Labeling, Criminal Embeddedness, and Subsequent Delinquency

By Jón Gunnar Bernburg, M. Krohn, Craig J. Rivera. 2006

465 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d7c6a1064fbfee98ae7b87ed1a04dff043505543

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Juvenile Justice Policy and Practice: A Developmental Perspective (2015, background): “18 In this section, we are concerned only with the effects of juvenile justice involvement and not the effects of arrest on subsequent offending (see Bernburg and Krohn 2003; Bernburg, Krohn, and Rivera 2006; Morris and Piquero 2013; Ward, Krohn, and Gibson 2014).”
Continuity and Change in Gang Membership and Gang Embeddedness (2013, background): “involvement (Hagan 1993; Uggen and Thompson 2003), contact with deviant peers (Bernburg et al. 2006; Hagan 1993; McCarthy and Hagan 1995; Uggen and Thompson 2003), proportion of friends involved in crime (McCarthy and Hagan 1995), and gang membership itself (Bernburg et al.”
Incarceration, Recidivism, and Employment (2016, background): “3 Recent studies in economics isolating incapacitation effects include those by Owens (2009), Buonanno and Raphael (2013), and Barbarino and Mastrobuoni (2014).”
Labeling and Cumulative Disadvantage (2012, background): “Although studies like Bernburg and Krohn (2003) and Bernburg, Krohn, and Rivera (2006) are instructive of the potential effect of labeling on social networks and life chances, they cannot determine whether official labeling at young ages has the type of enduring impact on life chances predicted by…”
Anticipated Stigma and Stigma Management Among Those to be Labeled “Ex-con” (2008, background): “Because researchers have only recently demonstrated solid empirical evidence for secondary deviance (Bernburg et al. 2006; Davies and Tanner 2003; Hagan and Palloni 2006; Matsueda 1992; Ray and Downs 1986), criminologists’ preference for other theories is not surprising (Akers 2000).”
The Effect of Police Contact (2016, methodology): “, 2012), increased identification with deviant attitudes and self-concepts (Ageton & Elliott, 1974; Kaplan & Johnson, 1991; Thomas & Bishop, 1984), and greater involvement with deviant peers (Bernburg et al., 2006; Johnson, Simons, & Conger, 2004).”