The effects of in-group versus out-group social comparison on self-esteem in the context of a negative stereotype.
By Hart Blanton, Jennifer Crocker, Dale T. Miller. 2000
180 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d71de27c373eb9040a97c8880edd8547baab0204
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Jessi L. Smith
- Carol Sansone
- Paul H. White
- J. S. Roman
- Nilanjana Dasgupta
- D. Marx
- Paul J Silvia
- Suzanne Hidi
In Social Psychology
- Jessi L. Smith
- Paul H. White
- Carol Sansone
- J. S. Roman
- Nilanjana Dasgupta
- D. Marx
- Paul J Silvia
- Suzanne Hidi
In Sociology and Political Science
- Jessi L. Smith
- Nilanjana Dasgupta
- Paul H. White
- D. Marx
- J. S. Roman
- Carol Sansone
- P. Lockwood
- Brian A. Nosek
Citations in the corpus
- The stereotyped task engagement process: The role of interest and achievement motivation. (2007, methodology): “First, to induce gender-stereotype salience for everyone before completing the task, participants were asked to complete a demographic survey that instructed them to check off their gender by marking the appropriate box (similar to procedures by C. M. Steele & Aronson, 1995; see also Blanton, Crock”
- Female Role Models: Protecting Women’s Math Test Performance (2002, methodology): “, math) that is esteem-relevant (Blanton et al., 2000; Brewer & Weber, 1994).”
- Ingroup Experts and Peers as Social Vaccines Who Inoculate the Self-Concept: The Stereotype Inoculation Model (2011, background): “For members of a negatively stereotyped group, seeing successful ingroup experts defies the negative stereotype, thereby enhancing their own self-efficacy and motivation to succeed (Blanton, Crocker, & Miller, 2000 ; Brewer & Weber, 1994 ).”