Organization of Knowledge and Innovation: The Case of Finnish Business Services
By Aija Leiponen. 2005
236 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Communication, Marketing, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d71b9ae79ff416e7602890690f293804ca51cc42
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Communication
In Marketing
- J. Love
- M. A. Mansury
- P. Ganotakis
- A. Hughes
- Elif Bascavusoglu-Moreau
- Andrea Mina
- David Doloreux
- S. Roper
In Strategy and Management
- J. Love
- S. Roper
- P. Ganotakis
- M. A. Mansury
- A. Hughes
- Andrea Mina
- Elif Bascavusoglu-Moreau
- David Doloreux
Citations in the corpus
- Learning from openness: The dynamics of breadth in external innovation linkages (2014, background): “This variable reflects not only units’ ability to introduce innovative products to the market but also their short-term commercial success, and is the most widely used indicator of innovation output in the literature (Laursen and Salter, 2006; Leiponen, 2005; Leiponen and Helfat, 2010; Roper et al.,”
- Innovation, productivity and growth in US business services: a firm-level analysis (2008, background): “Leiponen (2005) finds support for this view.”
- External Linkages, R&D and Innovation Performance in US Business Services (2007, methodology): “Over half of respondents have some in-house R&D facility, with one-third claiming that they have a formal R&D department, suggesting that US business service firms are more active in R&D than is the case in other surveys (Leiponen, 2005; Tether, 2005).”
- The benefits of R&D and breadth in innovation strategies: a comparison of Finnish service and manufacturing firms (2012, background): “Earlier studies have suggested that as in-house R&D activities play a lesser role in service innovation, firms in service industries engage in a highly interactive pattern of innovation with their environments (e.g., Tether, 2005; Leiponen, 2005).”
- Open service innovation and the firm's search for external knowledge (2014, methodology): “…between services and manufacturing increases with the level of knowledge-intensity, so that knowledge-intensive services (Koch & Strotmann, 2008; Leiponen, 2005, Love et al., 2011) will display innovation behaviors similar to those of hightechnology manufacturing firms (Hollenstein, 2003;…”
- Patterns of innovation in knowledge-intensive business services (2009, background): “positive impact of RD Leiponen, 2006).”
- Learning by exporting: Lessons from high-technology SMEs (2013, background): “Numerous studies have confirmed the importance of R&D in this respect (Love and Roper, 1999; Veugelers and Cassiman, 1999; Love and Roper, 2002; Leiponen, 2005).”