Existing and new approaches for the analysis of CATA data

By M. Meyners, J. Castura, B. Carr. 2013

411 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Analytical Chemistry, Animal Science and Zoology, Food Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d71661922acc89fe6d86e1cf27e9e8d616efeee8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Analytical Chemistry

1. Anna M. Crump
2. Lukas Danner
3. J. Gambetta
4. T. Johnson
5. S. Bastian
6. Alexander Croker

In Animal Science and Zoology

1. Anna M. Crump
2. Lukas Danner
3. J. Gambetta
4. T. Johnson
5. S. Bastian
6. Alexander Croker

In Food Science

1. Anna M. Crump
2. Lukas Danner
3. J. Gambetta
4. T. Johnson
5. S. Bastian
6. Alexander Croker

Citations in the corpus

• Comparison of Rate-All-That-Apply and Descriptive Analysis for the Sensory Profiling of Wine (2018, methodology): “…no published consensus regarding the optimum number of points for a RATA intensity scale, and previous studies have used 3-, 5-, 7-, 9-, and 15-point scales (Meyners et al. 2013, Ares et al. 2014b, Reinbach et al. 2014, FrancoLuesma et al. 2016, Giacalone and Hedelund 2016, Oppermann et al. 2016).”