The Digital Divide: Current and Future Research Directions

By Frederick J. Riggins, Sanjeev Dewan. Journal of the AIS, 2005

744 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Media Technology, Political Science and International Relations, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d6c118d8c0461b350e9925103db435776714781d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Media Technology

1. Andreas Eckhardt
2. Bernard C. Y. Tan
3. Hock Hai Teo
4. Tim Weitzel
5. Sven Laumer
6. Kwok Kee Wei
7. Karine Nahon
8. Hock Chuan Chan

In Political Science and International Relations

1. Bernard C. Y. Tan
2. Hock Hai Teo
3. Kwok Kee Wei
4. Karine Nahon
5. Hock Chuan Chan
6. Eli Hustad
7. Polyxeni Vassilakopoulou

In Strategy and Management

1. Bernard C. Y. Tan
2. Hock Hai Teo
3. Kwok Kee Wei
4. Karine Nahon
5. Hock Chuan Chan

Citations in the corpus

• Who influences whom? Analyzing workplace referents' social influence on IT adoption and non-adoption (2009, result): “This supports the claims that adopters and non-adopters ‘are driven by different factors’ (Venkatesh and Brown, 2001; Dewan and Riggins, 2005; Lapointe and Rivard, 2007).”
• Conceptualizing and Testing a Social Cognitive Model of the Digital Divide (2011, methodology): “We have also included the gender factor because this is a key factor in research on CSE and the digital divide (Cooper 2006, Dewan and Riggins 2005, Marakas et al. 1998).”
• Digital transformation of everyday life – How COVID-19 pandemic transformed the basic education of the young generation and why information management research should care? (2020, background): “There are issues with technology access and use (Agarwal et al., 2009; Riggins & Dewan, 2005; Song et al., 2020, Srivastava and Shainesh, 2015) – both among adults and children involved: there may even be issues with having access to the internet, devices, and applications needed.”
• Gaps and Bits: Conceptualizing Measurements for Digital Divide/s (2006, background): “Nevertheless, digital inequalities exist in variety of other levels: sector, community, and individual levels ( Dewan & Riggins, 2005 ).”
• Who Contacts Whom? Educational Homophily in Online Mate Selection (2011, neutral): “…or selective compared with many contexts in everyday life.2 Although there might still be a remarkable digital divide in modern societies (e.g. Dewan and Riggins 2005; Schulz et al., 2008), once this barrier has been passed, the digital marriage market is an open meeting space compared with…”