Gaps and Bits: Conceptualizing Measurements for Digital Divide/s

By Karine Nahon. The Information Society, 2006

373 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Digital Inequality (2008, background): “…(Fallows, 2004; National Telecommunications and Information Administration [NTIA], 2002), scholars have started calling for refined approaches to the study of the so-called digital divide (Barzilai-Nahon, 2006; Hargittai, 2002, 2003a; Mossberger, Tolbert, & Stansbury, 2003; van Dijk, 1999, 2005).”
Telecommunications Reform, Internet Use and Mobile Phone Adoption in the Developing World (2009, background): “…share of global infrastructure available in a country, comparing changes in the proportional supply of global ICT infrastructure over time, and assumes that technology adoption patterns within non-OECD countries rarely, if ever, follow an Scurve pattern (Barzilai-Nahon, 2006; Howard, 2007).”
Bridging Digital Divides: a Literature Review and Research Agenda for Information Systems Research (2021, methodology): “Overall, prior research has shown that the modalities of digital inequalities are context-specific and it is important to be explicit about the context when researching the digital divide (Barzilai-Nahon 2006).”
Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies (2010, background): “The digital divide is long documented (Bertot, 2003; Barzilai-Nahon, 2006; National Telecommunications and Information Administration, 1995, 2004) and broadly defined as the gap between those who have access to technologies and those who do not.”