Increasing Vaccination: Putting Psychological Science Into Action

By N. Brewer, Gretchen Chapman, Alexander J. Rothman, J. Leask, A. Kempe. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 2017

1,091 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in the UK: the Oxford coronavirus explanations, attitudes, and narratives survey (Oceans) II (2020, background): “Social processes such as norms, altruistic intent, and collective responsibility, have also been highlighted (Brewer et al., 2017; Crouse Quinn, Hilyard et al., 2017; Betsch et al., 2018).”
Which Healthy Eating Nudges Work Best? A Meta-Analysis of Field Experiments (2018, background): “…but not trying to change, what people think and feel are by far the most effective,” whereas “few randomized trials have successfully changed what people think and feel about vaccines, and those few that succeeded were minimally effective in increasing uptake” (Brewer et al. 2017, p. 149).”
Beyond confidence: Development of a measure assessing the 5C psychological antecedents of vaccination (2018, methodology): “This yields progress in being more specific and theoretically precise when assessing psychological antecedents of vaccination [11,12,22].”