Multitrophic Integration for Sustainable Marine Aquaculture

By T. Chopin, S. Robinson, M. Troell, A. Neori, A. Buschmann, J. Fang. 2008

153 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Aquatic Science, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d66cfc45cd6bc7f5b427d2780315bdf9a84177f9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Aquatic Science

1. A. Buschmann
2. C. Yarish
3. M. Edwards
4. S. L. Holdt
5. A. Neori
6. T. Chopin
7. J. Kim
8. S. Kraan

In Global and Planetary Change

1. C. Yarish
2. A. Buschmann
3. J. Kim
4. A. Neori
5. T. Chopin
6. S. Kraan
7. M. Park
8. Young Dae Kim

Citations in the corpus

• Open-water integrated multi-trophic aquaculture: environmental biomitigation and economic diversification of fed aquaculture by extractive aquaculture (2012, background): “…a way that allows one species’ uneaten feed and wastes, nutrients and by-products to be recaptured and converted into fertilizer, feed and energy for the other crops, and to take advantage of synergistic interactions between species (Chopin et al. 2001, 2008; Troell et al. 2003; Neori et al. 2004).”
• Cost-effective IMTA: a comparison of the production efficiencies of mussels and seaweed (2014, methodology): “Downloaded from orbit.dtu.dk on: May 05, 2020 Cost-effective IMTA: a comparison of the production efficiencies of mussels and seaweed”
• Ecological engineering in aquaculture — Potential for integrated multi-trophic aquaculture (IMTA) in marine offshore systems (2009, background): “In several studies,mussels and oysters grew faster adjacent to fish cages (Wallace, 1980; Jones and Iwama, 1991; Buschmann et al., 2000; Lefebvre et al., 2000; Lander et al., 2004; Chopin et al., 2008).”
• Importance of Seaweeds and Extractive Species in Global Aquaculture Production (2020, background): “One solution to reach such a goal would be the increased development of IMTA systems, especially in the western world (Chopin et al. 2008).”
• IMTA with Gracilaria vermiculophylla: Productivity and nutrient removal performance of the seaweed in a land-based pilot scale system (2011, background): “The best way to promote IMTA is to associate economic value to the environmental services provided by the seaweeds: CO2 sequestration, cleaner effluents and good marketing of the fish production need to have a cost associated (Neori et al., 2007; Chopin et al., 2008).”
• Mariculture of the Asian kelp Undaria pinnatifida and the native kelp Saccharina latissima along the Atlantic coast of Southern Europe: An overview (2016, background): “121] and bioremediation capacity to remove nutrients produced in coastal waters as a result of animal husbandry [122,123] (summarized”
• Traditional vs. Integrated Multi-Trophic Aquaculture of Gracilaria chilensis C. J. Bird, J. McLachlan & E. C. Oliveira: Productivity and physiological performance (2009, background): “Several studies have reported clear advantages of growing seaweeds near fish farms (e.g. Anderson et al., 1999; Buschmann et al., 2008c; Chopin et al., 2008;McVey et al., 2002; Nagler et al., 2003; Troell et al., 1997).”
• Algal Polysaccharides, Novel Applications and Outlook (2012, background): “…integrated with other shellfish or fish production systems, nutrient polution from these aquaculture systems could be alleviated through a process called IMTA (Integrated Multitrophic Aquaculture) while increasing production and carrying capacity (Chopin et al.,2001, 2008; Troell et al., 2009).”
• Seaweed aquaculture: cultivation technologies, challenges and its ecosystem services (2017, background): “…blooms and contribute to excessive growth of nuisance or opportunistic macroalgae, which in turn have negative consequences on coastal ecosystems and economies (Neori et al. 2004, Buschamann et al. 2008a, Chopin et al. 2008, Pereira and Yarish 2008, Abreu et al. 2009, 2011b, Kim et al. 2015a).”
• Incorporation of fish feed and growth of blue mussels (Mytilus edulis) in close proximity to salmon (Salmo salar) aquaculture: Implications for integrated multi-trophic aquaculture in Norwegian coastal waters (2012, unknown): “…countries to increase the carrying capacity of intensively cultured sea areas, there is still a wait-and-see attitude to this concept of ecological engineering for the purpose of reducing the environmental impact of intensive fish farming in open water in the western world (Chopin et al., 2008).”
• Antimicrobial use in aquaculture re-examined: its relevance to antimicrobial resistance and to animal and human health. (2013, background): “…Naylor and Burke, 2005; Asche et al., 2008; Cole et al., 2009; Diana, 2009), development and application of intensive methods of salmon farming in Norway and Chile have resulted in their being among the top 12 aquacultural producers of animal protein in the world (Chopin et al., 2008; FAO, 2010).”