Traditional vs. Integrated Multi-Trophic Aquaculture of Gracilaria chilensis C. J. Bird, J. McLachlan & E. C. Oliveira: Productivity and physiological performance

168 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Life cycle assessment of macroalgae cultivation and processing for biofuel production (2014, unknown): “The long-line cultivation method is more applicable for nutrient removal because lines can be deployed in most coastal areas whereas bottom cultivation is restricted due to depth requirements (Abreu et al., 2009).”
Seaweed aquaculture: cultivation technologies, challenges and its ecosystem services (2017, background): “…blooms and contribute to excessive growth of nuisance or opportunistic macroalgae, which in turn have negative consequences on coastal ecosystems and economies (Neori et al. 2004, Buschamann et al. 2008a, Chopin et al. 2008, Pereira and Yarish 2008, Abreu et al. 2009, 2011b, Kim et al. 2015a).”
Modelling the cultivation and bioremediation potential of the kelp Saccharina latissima in close proximity to an exposed salmon farm in Norway (2013, background): “Abreu et al. (2009) found that a 100 ha Gracilaria chilensis farm would be needed to fully bioremediate the DIN from a fish farm producing 1000 t of salmon.”