The importance of decoupling recurrent and disruption risks in a supply chain

By Sunil Chopra, Gilles Reinhardt, Usha Mohan. 2007

337 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management Information Systems, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d4aeea03b33b38c864a32c9dce910c2fb9aff9e5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Information Systems

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Disruption‐management strategies for short life‐cycle products (2009, background): “A single-period, random-yield, deterministic-demand problem in which a firm can reserve units with a perfectly reliable contingent supplier is examined in [6].”
Disruption risks in supply chain management: a literature review based on bibliometric analysis (2020, background): “An increasing number of scholars have been conducting and publishing articles about SCDs in the past two decades (Qi, Bard, and Yu 2004; Chopra, Reinhardt, and Mohan 2007; Ivanov, Sokolov, and Dolgui 2014; Cui et al. 2016).”
Can supply chain risk management practices mitigate the disruption impacts on supply chains’ resilience and robustness? Evidence from an empirical survey in a COVID-19 outbreak era (2020, background): “Risk mitigation Based on data collected in previous SCRM practices, risk mitigation seeks to address SC risks with appropriate measures through mitigation strategies before the disruption occurs or through contingency plans after the event unfolds (Azadegan et al., 2020; Chopra et al., 2007; Manuj a”
Does the ripple effect influence the bullwhip effect? An integrated analysis of structural and operational dynamics in the supply chain† (2019, background): “In SC literature, operational risks are frequently considered separated from disruption risks (Tang 2006; Chopra, Reinhardt, and Mohan 2007; Stecke and Kumar 2009; Sodhi, Son, and Tang 2012; Ho et al. 2015; Yildiz et al. 2016; Ivanov et al. 2017; Govindan et al. 2016, 2017; Dolgui, Ivanov, and…”
Coordination with a Backup Supplier Through Buy-Back Contract Under Supply Disruption (2010, background): “Similar to the work by Chopra et al. (2007), we consider the recurrent supply uncertainty that is only associated with delivery quantity variations.”
Single or dual sourcing: decision-making in the presence of supply chain disruption risks (2009, background): “[12] reported in a subsequent study that bundling operational risks and disruption risks may lead to erroneous decisions, higher inventories, and a higher supply chain cost than optimal.”
Literature review on disruption recovery in the supply chain* (2017, background): “Recurrent or operational risks and disruptive risks (Tang 2006, Chopra et al. 2007, Tsai 2016, Rezapour et al. 2017, Ivanov 2017a) are typically involved with those considerations.”