Executive “Brake Failure” following Deactivation of Human Frontal Lobe

By Christopher D. Chambers, Mark A. Bellgrove, Mark G. Stokes, Tracy R. Henderson, Hugh Garavan, Ian H. Robertson, Adam P. Morris, Jason B. Mattingley. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 2006

421 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Neurology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dbc573fb70ecab7990df36b0404276eb0aa46aa3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Neurology

Citations in the corpus

Insights into the neural basis of response inhibition from cognitive and clinical neuroscience. (2009, positive): “attentional role of the IFG is consistent with evidence that this region is necessary for stimulus-evoked response inhibition (Aron et al., 2003b; Chambers et al., 2006), thus raising the question of whether the attentional ‘circuit breaker’ is in fact the same neural”
Electroencephalography of response inhibition tasks: functional networks and cognitive contributions. (2013, methodology): “This outcome is in accordance with the fact that intracortical inhibition in motor regions, assessed via TMS, is increased in conditions calling for the suppression of a manual response, be it in a no-go or stop trial (Chambers et al., 2006; Coxon et al., 2006; van den Wildenberg et al., 2009; Waldv”
Mindfulness training and neural integration: differentiation of distinct streams of awareness and the cultivation of well-being (2007, background): “…Critchely et al., 2003), executive attention (Carter et al., 1999; Gehring and Fensik, 2001; Schoenbaum and Setlow, 2001; Gottfried et al. 2003; Chambers et al., 2006) and the aspects of insight and empathy that map the mind of self and others in reflections (Turken and Swick, 1999; Decety and…”
The Common Neural Basis of Exerting Self-Control in Multiple Domains (2009, neutral): “Another study found that temporary disruption of the right IFG using TMS increased SSRT and decreased percent inhibition at a given stop-signal delay, regardless of what hand the subjects were using to respond (Chambers et al., 2006).”
Cortical and Subcortical Contributions to Stop Signal Response Inhibition: Role of the Subthalamic Nucleus (2006, methodology): “…homologues of IFC affect No-Go (Iversen and Mishkin, 1970; Petrides, 1986) just as lesions of right IFC affect SSRT in humans (Aron et al., 2003a; Chambers et al., 2006), No-Go frontal inhibition could suppress activity at an earlier point in the motor hierarchy (e.g., frontal motor planning…”
Response inhibition in the stop-signal paradigm (2008, background): “Repetitive TMS (rTMS) of right IFG (but not left IFG or right middle frontal gyrus) impaired stopping but not going [21, 22 ].”
Process Overlap Theory: A Unified Account of the General Factor of Intelligence (2016, background): “, Derrfuss, Brass, Neumann, & von Cramon, 2005; Sohn, Ursu, Anderson, Stenger, & Carter, 2000) and response inhibition (e.g., Aron, Robbins, & Poldrack, 2004; Chambers et al., 2006), among others.”
Response Inhibition and Response Selection: Two Sides of the Same Coin (2008, background): “Recently, Chambers et al. (2006) did a ‘‘temporary lesion’’ study of the stop-signal task using repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), targeting the right IFC, the right DLPFC, and the right angular gyrus (AG).”
Models of Response Inhibition in the Stop-Signal and Stop-Change Paradigms (2008, methodology): “Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the right IFG influenced response inhibition but not interference control in a flanker task with stop signals ( Chambers et al., 2007; see also Chambers et al., in this special issue).”
Claude Bernard and the heart-brain connection: further elaboration of a model of neurovisceral integration. (2009, positive): “…that suggests that the right prefrontal cortex is preferentially related to inhibitory processes across a wide range of cognitive, motor, and affective tasks (Aron et al., 2004; Garavan et al., 1999; Konishi et al., 1999; Chambers et al., 2006; Kalisch et al., 2005; Lieberman et al., 2007).”
“Roles for the pre-supplementary motor area and the right inferior frontal gyrus in stopping action: electrophysiological responses and functional and structural connectivity” (2011, background): “(Note that this change is unlikely to change the results related to the stopping network since its right-laterality seems to be independent of hand used (Chambers et al., 2006; Konishi et al., 1998; Swann et al., 2009).)”
Triangulating a Cognitive Control Network Using Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Functional MRI (2007, positive): “These findings are supported by neuropsychological studies indicating that the right IFC is critical for stopping (Aron et al., 2003; Chambers et al., 2006).”