Collaborative Practice Research

By Lars Mathiassen. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 2000

504 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Pragmatism vs interpretivism in qualitative information systems research (2012, background): “Scientific knowledge from pragmatist research should also be valuable for practices outside the studied ones (Goldkuhl, 2008a; Mathiassen, 2002).”
Action Design Research (2011, background): “These perspectives and contributions may compete with one another or be complementary (Mathiassen 2002).”
Being Proactive: Where Action Research Meets Design Research (2005, methodology): “This choice is apparent in the manner in which the research approach is applied in its most prevalent forms, i.e. canonical action research (CAR) and one variation of it, collaborative practice research (Davison et al. 2004; Mathiassen 2002; Vigden et al. 1997).”
Design Principles for Competence Management Systems: A Synthesis of an Action Research Study (2004, background): “In other words, action researchers see it as their responsibility to assist practitioners by not only developing but also applying knowledge (Mathiassen 2002).”