Being Proactive: Where Action Research Meets Design Research

By Robert J. Cole, Sandeep Purao, Matti Rossi, Maung Kyaw Sein. International Conference on Interaction Sciences, 2005

359 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Pragmatism vs interpretivism in qualitative information systems research (2012, background): “There are some scholars who make their own explicit references to pragma-tism such as, for example, Hevner et al (2004), Cole et al (2005), and Lee & Nickerson (2010).”
A Paradigmatic Analysis of Information Systems As a Design Science (2007, background): “As a consequence, my conclusion is just the opposite to that of Cole et al. (2005), who maintain that design science and action research share important assumptions regarding ontology and epistemology. One explanation for this discrepancy may be that Cole et al. (2005) implicitly limit design scienc”
A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research (2007, methodology): “computer science [37, 46], and IS [1, 10 , 20, 31, 33, 40, 55, 56] has sought to collect and”
The Three Cycle View of Design Science (2007, methodology): “The field study of the artifact can be executed by means of appropriate technology transfer methods such as action research (Cole et al. 2005; Jarvinen 2007).”
Action Design Research (2011, background): “The design principles define the DR contribution and represent design knowledge emerging from the application of ADR.”