Design Principles for Competence Management Systems: A Synthesis of an Action Research Study

450 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Being Proactive: Where Action Research Meets Design Research (2005, methodology): “Lindgren et al. (2004) use a canonical action research approach to develop design principles for a competence management system.”
Co-Creation in Virtual Worlds: The Design of the User Experience (2011, background): “In the information systems literature, action research has been described as especially adequate for the development of system design principles (Lindgren et al. 2004).”
Action Research is Similar to Design Science (2007, background): “ Lindgren et al., (2004) was the only one of the three articles I can appreciate because they found that action research is close to design science.”
Action Design Research (2011, methodology): “The case was previously presented in published work as AR with a design orientation (Lindgren et al. 2004).”
Design theory for dynamic complexity in information infrastructures: the case of building internet (2010, methodology): “The theory formulation follows an approach similar to Lindgren et al. (2004), and Markus et al. (2002).”