Family Enterprise and Context

By Mike Wright, James J. Chrisman, Jess H. Chua, Lloyd Steier. 2014

155 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Management of Technology and Innovation, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d2eb1849cb7ac7bc01363edbeddbb29de86420cd

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

1. P. Duran
2. Marc van Essen
3. J. Arrégle
4. Michael A. Hitt
5. Alfredo De Massis
6. M. Carney
7. Mike W. Peng
8. Thomas M. Zellweger

In Management of Technology and Innovation

1. Marc van Essen
2. P. Duran
3. J. Arrégle
4. Michael A. Hitt
5. Alfredo De Massis
6. Mattias Nordqvist
7. K. Eddleston
8. Thomas M. Zellweger

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Marc van Essen
2. P. Duran
3. J. Arrégle
4. Michael A. Hitt
5. Alfredo De Massis
6. Thomas M. Zellweger
7. K. Eddleston
8. M. Carney

Citations in the corpus

• Family firm internationalization: heritage assets and the impact of bifurcation bias (2018, unknown): “, 2012, 2016); and (2) the specific contexts, both domestic and international ones, within which family firms operate (Wright et al., 2014; Carney, Gedajlovic, and Strike, 2014; Cruz et al., 2014).”
• Why is Family Firms’ Internationalization Unique? A Meta–Analysis (2017, background): “In short, the relationships between family firms and internationalization are context dependent (Wright et al., 2014).”