Do Manufacturing Firms Profit from Intraregional Innovation Linkages? An Empirical Based Answer
By Olaf Arndt, Rolf Sternberg. 2000
168 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Political Science and International Relations, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d2e269d526dba3e9fce6cd630b8a8ec08cbdf478
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Political Science and International Relations
- Tom Broekel
- Ayda Eraydin
- Bilge Armatlı Köroğlu
- Franz Tödtling
- A. Malmberg
- Mark Freel
- Patrick Lehner
- Alexander Kaufmann
In Strategy and Management
- Franz Tödtling
- Patrick Lehner
- Ayda Eraydin
- Bilge Armatlı Köroğlu
- Tom Broekel
- A. Malmberg
- D. Power
- Alexander Kaufmann
Citations in the corpus
- The Firm or the Region: What Determines the Innovation Behavior of European Firms? (2001, background): “In this context, firms have been shown by cluster analysis to fall into four categories (for details, see Arndt and Sternberg 2000): firms whose ties are mainly with innovation partners within the same region, firms with mainly interregional cooperative innovation ties (i.e., with collaborators…”
- Do different types of innovation rely on specific kinds of knowledge interactions (2008, background): “Arndt and Sternberg (2000) have studied the relationship between cooperation and the performance of companies (measured by the growth of employment and turnover, the share of turnover with innovative products, and the export ratio).”
- Network embeddedness and new-venture internationalization: Analyzing international linkages in the German biotech industry (2008, unknown): “According to the agglomeration literature, location within a research-active cluster facilitates localized knowledge diffusion (Arndt and Sternberg, 2000; Markusen, 1996) (George et al., 2002).”
- Absorptive capacity and the reach of collaboration in high technology small firms (2010, background): “All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2009.10.003 linkages over local linkages; suggesting that firms draw from innovation sources at a variety of spatial scales (e.g. Arndt and Sternberg, 2000; Kaufmann and Todtling, 2000).”
- (How) Do (Firms in) Clusters Create Knowledge? (2005, background): “Related to this are a small number of studies that suggest that in some clusters inter‐firm collaboration (formal and informal) does occur but this tends to be limited to a small number of highly innovative firms (Lyons, 2000 ) or to small to medium‐sized businesses (Arndt and Sternberg, 2000 ; th”
- Innovation, networking and the new industrial clusters: the characteristics of networks and local innovation capabilities in the Turkish industrial clusters (2005, methodology): “Arndt and Sternberg (2000) give the share of firms that use service networks as 67% and R&D services as 30% for 10 different European regions, whereas the average figure for three Turkish clusters is 90% (financial linkages are included) in total services, but 12% in R&D-based linkages.”
- Collaboration Intensity and Regional Innovation Efficiency in Germany—A Conditional Efficiency Approach (2012, background): “For instance, drawing on data for 10 European regions, Arndt and Sternberg (2000) find that collaborating with regional and inter-regional partners is particularly relevant for knowledge-intensive firms. Sternberg (1999) adds to this by showing that small and medium-sized firms in three German regio”