Deregulation, Ownership, and Productivity Growth in the Banking Industry: Evidence from India
By Subal C. Kumbhakar, Subrata Sarkar. 2003
274 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Finance
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d2df22aab5e81bef6c09f0c64840786d3b1bd3bf
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
- Rudra Sensarma
- Roman Matousek
- Saibal Ghosh
- Hsihui Chang
- G. Niazi
- A. Burki
- Li-Hua Huang
- Hsing-Chin Hsiao
In Finance
- Roman Matousek
- Rudra Sensarma
- Hidemichi Fujii
- G. Niazi
- A. Burki
- Shunsuke Managi
- Saibal Ghosh
- Hsihui Chang
Citations in the corpus
- Economic reforms, efficiency and productivity in Chinese banking (2007, background): “Kumbhakar and Sarkar (2003) found no improvement in TFP growth for public banks in India after deregulation but observed that private banks had benefited from deregulation.”
- Are foreign banks always the best? Comparison of state-owned, private and foreign banks in India (2006, methodology): “First, the decline of cost ine ciency over the entire sample period is consistent with Kumbhakar and Sarkar (2003b) who found that although cost ine ciency declined over time, the rate of decline slowed down subsequent to deregulation.”
- First Financial Restructuring and operating efficiency: Evidence from Taiwanese commercial banks. (2010, background): “In addition, Kumbhakar and Sarkar (2003) analyzed the relationship between deregulation and performance improvement using data from the Indian banking industry over a 12-year period from 1985 to 1996.”
- Financial deregulation and efficiency: An empirical analysis of Indian banks during the post reform period (2006, background): “A more recent study addresses this lacuna by covering both the pre- and post-liberalization era (Kumbhakar & Sarkar, 2003).”
- Regulatory Reform and Productivity Change in Indian Banking (2013, unknown): “2 For detailed reviews of the impact of financial reforms on the productivity change of banking systems see, for example, Mukherjee et al. (2001) and Kumbhakar and Sarkar (2003).”
- Indian bank efficiency and productivity changes with undesirable outputs: A disaggregated approach (2013, background): “The strong position of foreign banks in our findings contradicts earlier studies that used the data sample only for the 1990s and early 2000s (Kumbhakar and Sarkar (2003), Das and Ghosh (2006), Sanyal and Shankar (2011)).”
- Bank Ownership and Efficiency in China: What will Happen in the World's Largest Nation? (2009, unknown): “Kumbhakar and Wang (2005) find that the Big Four are less efficient than the joint-equity banks.”
- Market concentration, risk-taking, and bank performance: evidence from emerging economies (2013, background): “In India, an earlier study (Bhattacharyya et al., 1997) suggests that public banks are the best performers benefiting from deregulation, while subsequent work of Kumbhakar and Sarkar (2003) finds that the performance effect of deregulation is insignificant.”
- Impact of financial reforms on efficiency of state-owned, private and foreign banks in Pakistan (2010, background): “…foreign and private banks are generally more efficient than stateowned banks.7 These results suggest strong similarity between relative efficiency of domestic and foreign banks to that found by some other studies [e.g. Ataullah et al. (2004) for Pakistan and Kumbhakar and Sarkar (2003) for India].”
- Financial liberalization and bank efficiency: a comparative analysis of India and Pakistan (2004, methodology): “Kumbhakar and Sarkar suggest that public sector banks in India have become too dominant to feel the impact of changes in the economic environment brought about by financial liberalization. Hardy and de Patti (2001) examined the cost and revenue efficiency of 33 banks in Pakistan during 1981–1998 by ”
- The impact of regulatory reforms on cost structure, ownership and competition in Indian banking (2010, background): “banking system on bank efficiency and competition suggests a decrease in cost efficiency post-1992 (Kumbhakar and Sarkar, 2005; Sensarma, 2005). Das and Ghosh (2006) attribute the high cost inefficiency both to the under-utilisation of resources and to the scale of operations.”
- Financial deregulation and profit efficiency: A nonparametric analysis of Indian banks (2009, background): “A more recent study addresses this lacuna by covering both the pre- and postliberalization era (Kumbhakar and Sarkar, 2003).”