Economic reforms, efficiency and productivity in Chinese banking
By Subal C. Kumbhakar, Dan-dan Wang. 2007
137 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Finance, Management Science and Operations Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/508f43922fcf4fe6d5b3c7b6d4d96ce486b96c85
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
In Finance
In Management Science and Operations Research
Citations in the corpus
- Bank Ownership and Efficiency in China: What will Happen in the World's Largest Nation? (2009, unknown): “Kumbhakar and Wang (2005) find that the Big Four are less efficient than joint-equity banks.”
- The sources of bank productivity growth in China during 2002-2009: A disaggregation view (2012, methodology): “However, only a few research studies have taken a look at the productivity growth of Chinese banks, such as Kumbhakar and Wang (2007), Matthews et al. (2009) and Matthews and Zhang (2010).”
- Ownership Structure and Risk-Taking: Comparative Evidence from Private and State-Controlled Banks in China (2014, background): “The existing Chinese banking literature mainly examines the determinants of banks’ (accounting) performance or efficiency (Kumbhakar and Wang, 2007; Fu and Heffernan, 2007, 2010; Lin and Zhang, 2009; Berger et al., 2009; Zhang et al., 2013), while our study focuses on the risk-taking”
- Cost efficiency of the Chinese banking sector: A comparison of stochastic frontier analysis and data envelopment analysis (2014, unknown): “…a few studies have investigated the efficiency of Chinese banks using either a non-parametric or a parametric frontier approach (Chen et al. 2005, Ariff and Can 2008; and Luo et al. 2011 using DEA; Fu and Heffernan 2007, Kumbhakar and Wang 2007, Berger et al. 2009 and Jiang et al. 2009 using SFA).”