Why Assessment Centers Do Not Work the Way They Are Supposed To

By C. Lance. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2008

131 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Management Science and Operations Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d2de9186b4eec4f4fd32bd8e43b20d81dc83be5d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. Paul E. Spector
2. J. Conway
3. Michael T. Brannick
4. David Chan
5. Brian J. Hoffman
6. B. Dawson
7. David B Birkelbach
8. C. Lance

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. J. Conway
2. C. Lance
3. Paul E. Spector
4. Michael T. Brannick
5. David Chan
6. Brian J. Hoffman
7. B. Dawson
8. David B Birkelbach

Citations in the corpus

• What Is Method Variance and How Can We Cope With It? A Panel Discussion (2010, methodology): “…exercise effects in assessment centers have been shown to represent true cross-situational specificity in performance, not method bias effects (Lance, 2008), and occasion factors have been shown to reflect state aspects of the traits being measured (Schermelleh-Engel, Keith, Moosbrugger, &…”
• Method Effects, Measurement Error, and Substantive Conclusions (2010, background): “In one study that assessed these effects, Lance and Sloan (1993) conducted a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) of MTMM data consisting of a number of life facet satisfaction constructs (e.”