Lexical Priming: A New Theory of Words and Language

By A. Khamkhien. 2013

424 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d2c61907a820d4e5de7017d6fd6dca5e3b0268d3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Processing and learning of enhanced English collocations: An eye movement study (2017, background): “They also highlighted the centrality of ample exposure to the target language in collocation acquisition, as Hoey (2005) proposed.”
Explicit and Implicit Lexical Knowledge: Acquisition of Collocations Under Different Input Conditions (2013, background): “This notion of collocational priming was first hypothesized by Hoey (1991, 2005), who claimed that collocations are acquired incrementally through exposure to text.”
The idiom principle revisited (2014, background): “Indeed, there is growing evidence for this ‘lexical priming’ (Hoey 2005) effect in the acquisition of MWEs. Li and Schmitt (2009), for example, tracked the acquisition of academic MWEs in the written production of a Chinese learner studying in a UK university.”
Formulaic Language in Learner Corpora (2012, background): “It is now widely accepted that language is largely formulaic in nature, and that phraseological competence is an important part of nativelike, fluent, and idiomatic language use (Hoey, 2005; Pawley & Syder, 1983; Wray & Perkins, 2000).”
Lexical Sophistication as a Multidimensional Phenomenon: Relations to Second Language Lexical Proficiency, Development, and Writing Quality (2018, unknown): “From phraseological perspectives, the study provides evidence that multiunit lexical items are important components in L2 writing proficiency, L2 lexical proficiency, and longitudinal lexical growth (Ellis, 2002; Hoey, 2005; Sinclair, 1991).”
Not just ‘small potatoes’: Knowledge of the idiomatic meanings of collocations (2017, background): “However, the frequency school’s highlighting of statistical metrics means that they have typically not considered semantics to any great extent (although, as exceptions to this, see Conrad & Biber, 2004; Hoey, 2005).”
Corpus Research Applications in Second Language Teaching (2011, unknown): “…research in corpus linguistics has provided massive evidence for the inseparability of lexis and grammar (see, e.g., Biber, Conrad, & Cortes, 2004; Hoey, 2005; Hunston & Francis, 2000; Meunier & Granger, 2008; Römer, 2009b, 2010; Römer & Schulze, 2009; Sinclair, 1991, 2004d; Stubbs, 2001), so…”
Formulaic language (2008, unknown): “2005 Hoey, M. (2005). Lexical priming: A new theory of words and language.”
FREQUENCY OF INPUT AND L2 COLLOCATIONAL PROCESSING (2013, background): “Nonetheless, as several researchers have pointed out (e.g., Hoey, 2005 ), a suffi ciently large and adequately representative corpus can give us an indication of the types and regularity of input a language user is likely to have been exposed to, and it would certainly be odd to fi nd profi cient…”
Corpus Use in Language Learning: A Meta-Analysis. (2017, background): “Corpus linguistics has given rise to many insights to this patterning, including the idiom principle (Sinclair, 1991), lexical priming (Hoey, 2005), and norms and expectations (Hanks, 2013).”
Collocations in context:a new perspective on collocation networks (2015, background): “Ultimately, any discourse rests upon a large network of associations, where each one activates a number of others (cf. Hoey 2005), that produces social meaning through multiple cross-associations.”
Structured Belief State and the First Precision-Aware Benchmark for LLM Memory Retrieval (2026, unknown): “AgentMemory fails both scope disambiguation and cross-user isolation in the benchmark; a later issue report identified omitted agent-scope filtering in its shared mem::search path [22,27].”