From Competition to Collaboration in Public Service Delivery: A New Agenda for Research

By T. Entwistle, S. Martin. 2005

233 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, Political Science and International Relations, Public Administration

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d2a8cf6206daf2119ae36e9e2846e2523bba40a9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

1. Ingo Bode
2. M. Warner
3. A. Hefetz
4. Anna Amirkhanyan

In Political Science and International Relations

1. M. Warner
2. A. Hefetz
3. Anna Amirkhanyan
4. Ingo Bode
5. G. Bel
6. Xavier Fageda
7. Michael Howlett
8. E. Vigoda-Gadot

In Public Administration

1. M. Warner
2. A. Hefetz
3. Anna Amirkhanyan
4. Ingo Bode
5. G. Bel
6. Xavier Fageda
7. Elbert Dijkgraaf
8. Raymond Gradus

Citations in the corpus

• Managing Markets for Public Service: The Role of Mixed Public–Private Delivery of City Services (2008, background): “Relational contracting and managing networks of collaboration are being given more emphasis than the role of competition in promoting innovation (Boyne, 1998b; Entwistle & Martin, 2005; Goldsmith & Eggers, 2004; Sclar, 2000).”
• Disorganized welfare mixes: voluntary agencies and new governance regimes in Western Europe (2006, background): “Yet Britain has also seen an increasing involvement of voluntary organizations in this sector, with the governance of welfare often being channelled through quasi-networks rather than quasi-markets (Entwistle and Martin, 2005; Powell and Exworthy, 2002).”
• From New Public Management to New Public Governance? Hybridization and Implications for Public Sector Consumerism (2014, unknown): “This has been accompanied by a growing critique of market-like arrangements and the propagation of networkbased forms of organizing placing stronger emphasis on inter-organizational collaboration than competition to meet customer needs (Dunleavy et al., 2005; Entwistle and Martin, 2005; Newman, 2001”
• Collaborative Performance Measurement: Examining and Explaining the Prevalence of Collaboration in State and Local Government Contracts (2009, methodology): “Collaboration presumes a deviation from hierarchical decision making; it requires participation of several actors in the governance process and some degree of trust in the partners’ competencies that are ‘‘unlocked’’ through collaboration (Entwistle and Martin 2005, 2004).”