Affect’s Future: Rediscovering the Virtual in the Actual

By L. Grossberg, Interviewed by Gregory J. Seigworth, Melissa Gregg. 2010

131 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cultural Studies, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d298545177ecdf5830005e4c12c52d2bef3b9e66

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cultural Studies

1. M. Fotaki
2. Sheena J. Vachhani
3. Kate Kenny

In Social Psychology

1. M. Fotaki
2. Kate Kenny

In Sociology and Political Science

1. M. Fotaki
2. Kate Kenny

Citations in the corpus

• Thinking critically about affect in organization studies: Why it matters (2017, background): “Outside of organization studies, scholars suggest innovative approaches to how affect can be discerned from patterns emerging in the observation of social life; these include ‘mattering maps’ (Grossberg, 2010: 316), ‘bloom spaces’ (Stewart, 2010) and ‘ethical noticing’ (Berlant, 2011).”