Knowledge sources of entrepreneurship: Firm formation by academic, user and employee innovators☆

By Rajshree Agarwal, Sonali K. Shah. 2014

263 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Management of Technology and Innovation, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d275f0a4ef0ae76809bf81aa1402d4abeb52c6ab

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

1. Roy Thurik
2. J. Hessels
3. I. Verheul
4. Peter van der Zwan
5. Stephanie Zayed
6. Alan C. O’Connor
7. Andrew J. Nelson
8. Maureen McKelvey

In Management of Technology and Innovation

1. J. Hessels
2. Roy Thurik
3. Peter van der Zwan
4. I. Verheul
5. Christopher S. Hayter
6. Andrew J. Nelson
7. Stephanie Zayed
8. Alan C. O’Connor

In Strategy and Management

1. Roy Thurik
2. Stephanie Zayed
3. Alan C. O’Connor
4. Andrew J. Nelson
5. Maureen McKelvey
6. J. Hessels
7. J. Mawdsley
8. Deepak Somaya

Citations in the corpus

• User entrepreneurs' multiple identities and crowdfunding performance: Effects through product innovativeness, perceived passion, and need similarity (2019, unknown): “User entrepreneurship is a phenomenon that grew out of the user innovation literature (Agarwal and Shah, 2014).”
• Knowledge-intensive innovative entrepreneurship integrating Schumpeter, evolutionary economics, and innovation systems (2020, background): “…include gazelles (Birch 1979; Henrekson and Johansson 2010); new technology based firms (for example Colombo et al. 2004; Colombo and Grilli 2005); academic entrepreneurship (Agarwal and Shah 2014); new engineering based firms (for example Autio 1997); and innovative entrepreneurship (Shane 2009).”
• Conceptualizing academic entrepreneurship ecosystems: a review, analysis and extension of the literature (2018, background): “…experience of university faculty, networks with outside contacts are crucial to motivate entrepreneurial activities as well as their success (e.g., Agarwal and Shah 2014; Druilhe and Garnsey 2004; Fini et al. 2011; Grandi and Grimaldi 2003, 2005; Guerrero et al. 2014; Heblich and Slavtchev 2014;…”
• To be born is not enough: the key role of innovative start-ups (2016, unknown): “By the same token, entrepreneurs’ human and social capital are key drivers, as well (Colombo et al. 2004; Colombo and Grilli 2005; BarNir 2012; Szopa 2013; Agarwal and Shah 2014; Cortese et al. 2015; Hafer and Jones 2015; Kaiser and Muller 2015).”
• Factors influencing the entrepreneurial engagement of opportunity and necessity entrepreneurs (2016, background): “Innovative firms are central to economic development and the evolution of industries, and entrepreneurs differ in their likelihood to engage in process and/or product innovation (Agarwal and Shah 2014).”
• Employee Mobility and Organizational Outcomes (2016, background): “Similarly, because the ability to transfer knowledge and routines from incumbent firms is an important driver of entrepreneurial spin-outs (see Agarwal & Shah, 2014, for a review), strategies to limit the appropriation of such knowledge by spin-outs may help established firms retain competitive…”
• The Schumpeterian entrepreneur: a review of the empirical evidence on the antecedents, behaviour and consequences of innovative entrepreneurship (2017, unknown): “We also consulted existing literature reviews and meta analyses on topics related to our research question (e.g. Djokovic and Souitaris 2008; Rosenbusch, Brinckmann, and Bausch 2011; Agarwal and Shah 2014).”