A FACETS analysis of rater bias in measuring Japanese second language writing performance

By K. Kondo-Brown. 2002

174 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, Information Systems, Language and Linguistics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d2610ca4afc3ca8ebd5aa721cc834af239159659

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

1. T. Eckes
2. Edward Schaefer
3. Sumie Matsuno
4. Ricky Lam

In Information Systems

1. Edward Schaefer
2. T. Eckes
3. Sumie Matsuno
4. Ricky Lam

In Language and Linguistics

1. T. Eckes
2. Edward Schaefer
3. Sumie Matsuno
4. Ricky Lam

Citations in the corpus

• Examining Rater Effects in TestDaF Writing and Speaking Performance Assessments: A Many-Facet Rasch Analysis (2005, background): “Moreover, researchers found significant effects for rater–ratee interaction (Kondo-Brown, 2002; Lynch & McNamara, 1998), rater–task type interaction (Lynch & McNamara, 1998; Wigglesworth, 1993), and rater–criteria interaction (Wigglesworth, 1993).”
• Self-, peer-, and teacher-assessments in Japanese university EFL writing classrooms (2009, background): “However, Kondo-Brown (2002) mentioned, ‘it is not clear how the weightings were determined in the original version, and some researchers have questioned the assignment of different weights to evaluation criteria’ (p. 9).”
• Rater bias patterns in an EFL writing assessment (2008, background): “Although some scales have different weights, it is sometimes unclear how the weights are determined (Kondo-Brown, 2002).”