Examining Rater Effects in TestDaF Writing and Speaking Performance Assessments: A Many-Facet Rasch Analysis

By T. Eckes. 2005

200 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education, Management Science and Operations Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6d15eb9191dac68675426aa7882233b0d58ea626

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. George Leckie
2. J. Baird
3. T. Eckes

In Education

1. George Leckie
2. J. Baird
3. T. Eckes

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. George Leckie
2. J. Baird
3. T. Eckes
4. S. Youn

Citations in the corpus

• Rater types in writing performance assessments: A classification approach to rater variability (2008, methodology): “Judged by rater infit and rater outfit indices, resulting from routinely run many-facet Rasch analyses, the vast majority of raters provided high-quality scoring in the sessions in which they participated (for more detail on these analyses, see Eckes, 2003; 2004; 2005b).”
• Rater Effects on Essay Scoring: A Multilevel Analysis of Severity Drift, Central Tendency, and Rater Experience (2011, result): “This finding is consistent with the literature (Myford & Wolfe, 2009; Engelhard, 1994; Knoch et al., 2007; Eckes, 2005).”
• Operational Rater Types in Writing Assessment: Linking Rater Cognition to Rater Behavior (2012, methodology): “2 (Council of Europe, 2001; see also Eckes, 2005, 2008a; Kecker & Eckes, 2010).”