Learning methods for teacher education: the use of online discussions to improve critical thinking
By Zsuzsanna Szabó, Jonathan Schwartz. 2011
111 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d22b77a68bd1082c02c2af01e9ef57145f946d0c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
Citations in the corpus
- Research Based Practices for Improving the Effectiveness of Asynchronous Online Discussion Boards (2018, background): “…on their answers which facilitates critical thinking skills and the ability to support arguments with evidence (Arend, 2009; Guiller, Durndell, & Ross, 2008; Szabo & Schwartz, 2011) • confusion about the purpose of the discussion board and the instructor’s expectations (Balaji &…”
- Learning in the practicum: engaging pre-service teachers in reflective practice in the online space (2014, background): “Providing models of deeper reflection, asking appropriate questions (Szabo & Schwartz, 2011), purposeful assessment (Hibbard et al., 2010), and/or focussing on individual’s rather than group contributions (Means et al., 2010) could also deepen learning.”
- Effectiveness of Critical Thinking Instruction in Higher Education: A Systematic Review of Intervention Studies (2013, unknown): “…WGCTA + Solon (2007)b Mixed DI (coaching) 1st RA CCTT + Stark (2012) Immersion Discussion method (critiquing scientific examples) 2nd CCTT 0 DS + Szabo and Schwartz (2011) Immersion Discussion method RT Ennis-Weir + Toy and Ok (2012) Infusion DI (through questioning, role playing & case…”