Attribute Range Effects in Binary Response Tasks

By Tobias Ohler, Aihong Le, Jordan J. Louviere, Joffre Swait. 2000

86 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Dissecting the Random Component of Utility (2002, background): “Ohler et al. (1999) studied how attribute range differences impacted binary response outcomes and random component variability in a conjoint analysis task by varying attribute ranges over two levels (a wide range, and middle levels in the wide range).”
Design efficiency for non-market valuation with choice modelling: how to measure it, what to report and why* (2008, unknown): “…and alternatives (DeShazo and Fermo 2002; Arentze et al. 2003), the impact of attribute level range upon response (Cooke and Mellers 1995; Ohler et al. 2000; Verlegh 280 R. Scarpa and J. Rose © 2008 The Authors Journal compilation © 2008 Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics…”
Gender-specific starting point bias in choice experiments: Evidence from an empirical study (2008, background): “Hanley et al. [32] and Ohler et al. [ 64 ] find no effect of changing the price vector used whereas Carlsson and Martinsson [21] and Ryan and Wordsworth [68] find the opposite.”
Ordering effects and choice set awareness in repeat-response stated preference studies (2012, methodology): “First, our full-factorial design allows us to estimate interaction effects in preferences for attributes, avoiding a known source of misspecification bias [43].”