International Knowledge Diffusion and Home‐bias Effect: Do USPTO and EPO Patent Citations Tell the Same Story?*
By E. Bacchiocchi, F. Montobbio. 2010
110 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/36a99fc3444b665f42036d88f468aaf6dc7887e7
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- F. Montobbio
- Claudio Fassio
- F. Crespi
- V. Costantini
- A. Venturini
- Chiara Martini
- L. Pennacchio
- S. Gürlük
Citations in the corpus
- Demand-pull and technology-push public support for eco-innovation: The case of the biofuels sector (2015, background): “Differences in using EPO or USPTO patents at sectoral level are well detected in Bacchiocchi and Montobbio (2010). classified as Food and Sugar as the main technological domains available in BioPat) and advanced generation biofuels (here classified as Ligno and Algae as the main technological…”
- Skilled migration and innovation in European industries (2019, background): “See Bacchiocchi and Montobbio (2010) for the analysis of the truncation bias in patent citations in different patent offices.”
- Patent citation data in social science research: Overview and best practices (2017, unknown): “Bacchiocchi and Montobbio (2010) analyze the geographic distribution of cited documents for a set of 657,151 equivalent patents filed at the EPO and the USPTO.”