Global change and species interactions in terrestrial ecosystems.

By J. Tylianakis, Raphael K. Didham, Jordi Bascompte, David A. Wardle. Ecology Letters, 2008

2,395 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d16b6a287a9f680aee649555f21091761384aeb8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

In Plant Science

Citations in the corpus

Using latent variable models to identify large networks of species‐to‐species associations at different spatial scales (2016, background): “Quantifying networks of ecological interactions and assessing their changes due to global environmental change has been the focus of much recent research (Fortuna & Bascompte 2006; Tylianakis et al. 2008; Ara ujo et al. 2011).”
Explaining microbial population genomics through phage predation (2009, background): “This high efficiency in substrate use at the ecosystem level will be sustained by the use of all available metabolites and minerals and by the presence of a high diversity, which is known to promote efficient ecosystem functionin”
Net effects of multiple stressors in freshwater ecosystems: a meta‐analysis (2016, background): “…ecosystems respond to similar stressors may depend on characteristics of the biological receptors and the environmental context, including the different communities, mechanisms, ecological networks and abiotic conditions present (Bancroft et al., 2007; Tylianakis et al., 2008; Segner et al., 2014).”
Genetic and environmental interactions determine plant defences against herbivores (2011, background): “The extent to which biochemical plant responses to changing abiotic conditions have quantitative effects on natural plant–herbivore interactions is, however, still poorly understood (e.g. Tikkanen & Julkunen-Tiitto 2003; Thylianakis et al. 2008).”
Merging DNA metabarcoding and ecological network analysis to understand and build resilient terrestrial ecosystems (2016, background): “Furthermore, they can be 56 used to quantify the effects of human activities (Tylianakis et al. 2008), with promising novel 57 applications for nature conservation (Kaiser-Bunbury & Blüthgen 2015) and restoration 58 (Montoya, Rogers & Memmott 2012).”
Towards novel approaches to modelling biotic interactions in multispecies assemblages at large spatial extents (2012, background): “Theoretical and empirical studies suggest that biotic interactions play an important role in determining the response of species and communities to changing environments (Araújo & Luoto, 2007; Heikkinen et al., 2007; Kissling et al., 2007; Tylianakis et al., 2008; Gilman et al., 2010).”
Integrating plant–soil interactions into global carbon cycle models (2009, background): “As recently highlighted by Tylianakis et al. (2008) the unanticipated effects of multiple drivers acting simultaneously create major challenges in predicting future responses to global environmental change.”
Beneficial microbes in a changing environment: are they always helping plants to deal with insects? (2013, background): “However, an emerging new issue is how environmental changes will affect the interactions between plants and multiple organisms (Tylianakis et al. 2008; van der Putten, Macel & Visser 2010), such as microbe–plant, plant–insect and plant–microbe–insect interactions.”
Space can substitute for time in predicting climate-change effects on biodiversity (2013, background): “There are other good reasons to exercise caution when applying empirically calibrated models to project biodiversity responses to 21st century climate change, including the prospect of shifting realized niches and emergent species interactions, the challenge of extrapolating models to no-analog clim”
Plant phenology and global climate change: Current progresses and challenges (2019, background): “The diverse phenological sensitivities to cli‐ mate change across taxa and trophic levels have been found to alter the interactions among plants and their herbivores (Tylianakis et al., 2008).”
Warming alters the size spectrum and shifts the distribution of biomass in freshwater ecosystems (2011, background): “Therefore, there is an increasingly urgent need to explore the effects of the principal components of climate change (e.g., warming) on community structure and ecosystem functioning (Tylianakis et al., 2008; Montoya & Raffaelli, 2010).”
Climate‐driven change in plant–insect interactions along elevation gradients (2014, background): “Assessing the consequences of climate change on ecosystems dynamics and species interactions is becoming increasingly urgent (Schr€oter et al. 2005; Tylianakis et al. 2008; Wu et al. 2011; de Sassi, Lewis & Tylianakis 2012).”
Impacts of invasive biota in forest ecosystems in an aboveground–belowground context (2017, background): “However the role of global change drivers in mediating the impacts of biological invasions has been seldom considered (Tylianakis et al. 2008).”
Conserving Southeast Asian forest biodiversity in human-modified landscapes (2010, background): “…maintaining resilient ecosystems and ensuring sustainable ecosystem goods and services require new concepts (e.g. Bengtsson et al., 2003; Tylianakis et al., 2008a) with interaction effects of major global-change drivers being little appreciated (Brook et al., 2008; Tylianakis et al., 2008b).”