Beneficial microbes in a changing environment: are they always helping plants to deal with insects?

By A. Pineda, M. Dicke, C. Pieterse, M. Pozo. 2013

227 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f549a868eb88bcb4ce8c5a731c47b7feaff536ff

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Plant Science

1. C. Pieterse
2. P. Bakker
3. J. Kloepper
4. A. Biere
5. M. Dicke
6. C. Zamioudis
7. Alison E. Bennett
8. R. Berendsen

Citations in the corpus

• Induced systemic resistance by beneficial microbes. (2014, background): “However, negative effects of beneficial microbes on plant-insect interactions have been reported as well (115).”
• Three‐way interactions between plants, microbes and insects (2013, background): “Pineda et al. (2013) in this issue show that this crosstalk is not restricted to signals coming from the biotic component of the environment.”
• Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi affect plant tolerance and chemical defences to herbivory through different mechanisms (2016, background): “The effects of below-ground symbionts can even extend to higher trophic levels, such as the parasitoids and parasites of herbivores (Pineda et al. 2013b).”
• Evolutionary adaptation in three-way interactions between plants, microbes and arthropods (2013, background): “1995; van der Meijden & Klinkhamer 2000; Allison & Hare 2009) and whether under stressful conditions plants can attract rhizobacteria to trigger a priming response that enhances their defence against herbivore attacks (Pineda et al. 2013).”
• Ecological and phytohormonal aspects of plant volatile emission in response to single and dual infestations with herbivores and phytopathogens (2013, background): “Among many examples, auxin appears to disrupt biosynthesis of SA and to modify JA signalling, abscisic acid can antagonize JA-ET signalling (Pineda et al. 2013), and brassinosteriods can lead to increased plant resistance towards biotrophic pathogens (Robert-Seilaniantz, Grant & Jones 2011).”
• Bacterial-mediated drought tolerance: Current and future prospects (2016, background): “…have received global attention because of their root colonizing ability and their capacity to produce a wide range of enzymes and metabolites that help plants tolerate biotic and abiotic stresses (Mayak et al., 2004; Glick et al., 2007; Kim et al., 2009; Pineda et al., 2013; Chauhan et al., 2015).”
• Efficiency of microbial bio-agents as elicitors in plant defense mechanism under biotic stress: A review (2021, background): “Despite of eliciting ISR to activate plant immune response, beneficial microbes have also been reported to exert negative effects on plant-insect interaction (Pineda et al., 2013).”
• Effects of bean seed treatment by the entomopathogenic fungi Metarhizium robertsii and Beauveria bassiana on plant growth, spider mite populations and behavior of predatory mites (2019, background): “…effects on many different herbivores feeding on various plants colonized by variable taxa of entomopathogenic fungi, it seems relevant to focus future research on whether these fungi moderate the plant defense systems as has been reported from other beneficial microbes (e.g. Pineda et al., 2013).”