On the role of stimulus-response and stimulus-stimulus compatibility in the Stroop effect

By J. de Houwer. 2003

110 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, General Decision Sciences

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d09aaa48851aa1be581f3ce55ae91cb2750d1498

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Vincent van Veen
2. Cameron S. Carter
3. Thomas W. Schubert
4. S. Giessner
5. S. Waldzus
6. Tobias Egner
7. David M. Amodio
8. Marc D. Lewis

In General Decision Sciences

1. Cameron S. Carter
2. Vincent van Veen

Citations in the corpus

• Control over the AssoCiAtion of Power And size (2009, background): “One way to address this problem in future research may be to work with load manipulations that reduce the likelihood of a covert (subverbal) categorization of the modal interfering stimulus (de Houwer, 2003).”
• Separating semantic conflict and response conflict in the Stroop task: A functional MRI study (2005, methodology): “A different behavioral study that showed evidence that both forms of conflict contribute to the Stroop interference effect was conducted by De Houwer (2003).”