Separating semantic conflict and response conflict in the Stroop task: A functional MRI study

By Vincent van Veen, Cameron S. Carter. NeuroImage, 2005

376 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f3a1297f6421fbd474b55d7da3481bd1735df906

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

Citations in the corpus

Anterior cingulate cortex and conflict detection: An update of theory and data (2007, background): “However, subsequent studies have suggested that in some situations, the ACC can also be engaged with conflicts between other types of representations, such as semantic or conceptual representations (Badre & Wagner, 2004; van Veen & Carter, 2005; Weissman, Giesbrecht, Song, Mangun, & Woldorff, 2003).”
The Electrophysiological Dynamics of Interference during the Stroop Task (2008, background): “…that interference in the Stroop task mainly activates frontal brain areas such as the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC; van Veen & Carter, 2005; Kerns et al., 2004; Zysset, Mu¨ller, Lohmann, & von Cramon, 2001; MacDonald, Cohen, Stenger, & Carter, 2000).”
Separate conflict-specific cognitive control mechanisms in the human brain (2007, background): “While conflict in a typical Stroop protocol can thus be argued to reflect an additive effect of stimulus (conceptual) and response conflict (Milham et al., 2001; De Houwer, 2003; van Veen and Carter, 2005), we are here not concerned with this distinction.”
Typologies of attentional networks (2006, background): “, as well as by several other studies that attempted to dissociate stimulus–stimulus from stimulus–response conflic”
Congruency sequence effects and cognitive control (2007, background): “Also as in the flanker task, an incongruent Stroop stimulus is associated with both stimulus conflict and response conflict if different stimulus values are mapped onto different manual responses (De Houwer, 2003; Milham et al., 2001; van Veen & Carter, 2005; H. Zhang & Kornblum, 1998).”