Control over the AssoCiAtion of Power And size

By Thomas W. Schubert, S. Waldzus, S. Giessner. 2009

106 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6d4a69641ae85c0554ef429741350b9191e589a4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Joey T. Cheng
2. Pamela K. Smith
3. Adam D. Galinsky
4. Jessica L. Tracy
5. Richard W. Robins
6. J. Prooijen

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Pamela K. Smith
2. Joey T. Cheng
3. Jessica L. Tracy
4. Adam D. Galinsky
5. Derek D. Rucker
6. Jon K. Maner
7. Francesca Gino
8. Joe C. Magee

Citations in the corpus

• The Nonconscious Nature of Power: Cues and Consequences (2010, background): “Schubert, Waldzus, and Giessner (2009) showed participants names of low-power groups (e.g., student) and high-power groups (e.g., professor), and participants had to indicate whether each group was powerful or powerless.”
• Toward a Unified Science of Hierarchy: Dominance and Prestige are Two Fundamental Pathways to Human Social Rank (2014, background): “Moreover, the human mind is biased toward intuitively associating larger size with greater formidability, power and influence, and leadership capacity (Fessler et al. 2012; Marsh et al. 2009; Schubert et al. 2009; Stulp et al. 2013).”