SSL: a theory of how people learn to select strategies.

By Jörg Rieskamp, Philipp E Otto. Journal of experimental psychology. General, 2006

605 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, General Decision Sciences, Safety Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cfeccccd73bd65738e0b2d403cf371eac9b7c940

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

In General Decision Sciences

In Safety Research

Citations in the corpus

Predicting Wimbledon 2005 tennis results by mere player name recognition (2007, positive): “Yet past research has shown in many situations that people are often well adapted to their environment such that they select the strategies or heuristics that work best in a given situation (Rieskamp & Otto, 2006).”
Intuitive and deliberate judgments are based on common principles. (2011, background): “, & Brock, T. C. (1976). Distraction can enhance or reduce yielding to propaganda: Thought disruption versus effort justification.”
Why Heuristics Work (2008, background): “Strategy selection learning theory describes how heuristics are selected based on individual reinforcement learning (Rieskamp & Otto, 2006).”
Coherence Shifts in Probabilistic Inference Tasks (2010, background): “For example, there is evidence supporting the view that individuals are able to learn strategies based on appropriate feedback (e.g., Rieskamp & Otto, 2006).”
EPISTEMIC ANXIETY AND ADAPTIVE INVARIANTISM (2010, background): “Indeed, as Jörg Rieskamp and Philipp Otto among others have noted, if strategy selection always had to be a matter of conscious decision, one could well be stuck with ‘a recursive homunculi problem of deciding how to decide’ (Rieskamp & Otto, 2006, 207).”
An eye‐tracking study on information processing in risky decisions: Evidence for compensatory strategies based on automatic processes (2011, background): “Hence, such small changes should not influence decision strategies if it holds true that they are selected on the basis of a considerable learning experience Copyright # 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 24, 71–98 (2011) DOI: 10.1002/bdm (Rieskamp & Otto, 2006).”
Environments That Make Us Smart (2007, methodology): “Moreover, people are sensitive to the distribution of cues in an environment, appropriately applying either Take The Best or a weighted additive mechanism, depending on which will be more accurate (Rieskamp & Otto, 2006).”
The Study of Bias in Entrepreneurship (2017, background): “On a 18 ENTREPRENEURSHIP THEORY and PRACTICE neurological level, decision making under risk differs from decision making under uncertainty (Volz & Gigerenzer, 2012).”
Loss aversion, diminishing sensitivity, and the effect of experience on repeated decisions† (2008, positive): “Under their solution the probability of selecting each mode is determined by a reinforcement learning process (and see related ideas in Stahl, 2000 and Rieskamp & Otto, 2006).”
Instant Customer Base Analysis: Managerial Heuristics Often “Get it Right”: (2008, background): “Support for Grigerenzer’s work is manifold (Bröder 2000, 2003; Bröder and Schiffer 2003; Lee and Cummins 2004; Newell et al. 2004; Newell and Shanks 2003; Newell, Weston, and Shanks 2003; Rieskamp 2006; Rieskamp and Hoffrage 1999; Rieskamp and Otto 2006).”
Nudge Versus Boost: How Coherent are Policy and Theory? (2015, background): “…been found to evaluate ground beef more favorably when it is described as 75 % lean than when it is described as 25 % fat [Levin and Gaeth 1988; see Rothman et al. (2006) and Gerend and Cullen (2008) on the effectiveness of framed messages in influencing decisions, particularly in the realm of…”
Inferences under time pressure: how opportunity costs affect strategy selection. (2008, methodology): “In many areas of cognitive psychology researchers have favored a strategy repertoire approach (e.g., Brown, 1995; Einhorn, 1970; Erev & Barron, 2005; Ginossar & Trope, 1987; Rieskamp & Otto, 2006; Siegler, 1999; Svenson, 1979).”
Rationality for Mortals: How People Cope with Uncertainty (2008, methodology): “This adaptive process is illustrated by an experiment by Rieskamp and Otto (2006).”
Homo Heuristicus: Why Biased Minds Make Better Inferences (2009, methodology): “The study of ecological rationality of a heuristic provides the predictions for its adaptive use (e.g., Rieskamp & Otto, 2006).”