Are Internet and Paper-and-Pencil Personality Tests Truly Comparable?

By Adam W. Meade, Lawrence C. Michels, G. Lautenschlager. 2007

96 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cf6677dad200ea9e033c55b1eff6f4a049c01bf0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Eric N. Wiebe
2. David J. Sharek
3. Adam W. Meade
4. Tara S. Behrend

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Eric N. Wiebe
2. David J. Sharek
3. Adam W. Meade
4. Tara S. Behrend

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Eric N. Wiebe
2. David J. Sharek
3. Adam W. Meade
4. Tara S. Behrend
5. S. Michael Gaddis
6. Jesse J. Chandler
7. Jesús Salgado
8. Gabriel Táuriz

Citations in the corpus

• The viability of crowdsourcing for survey research (2011, background): “However, there appears to be some consensus that these two approaches are largely equivalent in terms of the psychometric properties that can be expected (Cole, Bedeian, & Field, 2006; De Beuckalaer & Lievens, 2009; Meade, Michels, & Lautenschlager, 2007; Meyerson & Tryon, 2003; Stanton, 1998), as”