Shape-Memory Materials

By V. Konchits. 2006

1,209 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cf4820f7f49b7428c9f3b73c2296c44446b4ec94

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Polymers and Plastics

Citations in the corpus

Actuating Textiles: Next Generation of Smart Textiles (2018, background): “This property is observed when, without any temperature change, the alloy can return to its original shape after a mechanical strain has been applied and then is withdrawn[53].”
Three-dimensional modeling and numerical analysis of rate-dependent irrecoverable deformation in shape memory alloys (2010, background): “Note that in this particular material, the observed modulus of martensite exceeds that of austenite, which is not common in SMAs (Otsuka and Wayman, 1999).”
Modulated martensite: why it forms and why it deforms easily (2010, background): “Commonly, the hysteresis during a structural transition is ascribed to a barrier imposed by the excess energy of defects that connect parent and product phase [34].”
Iron-based shape memory alloys for civil engineering structures: An overview (2014, background): “Shape memory alloys (SMAs) are unique materials that have the ability to achieve great deformations and to return to a predefined shape after unloading or upon heating [1].”
A review of constitutive models and modeling techniques for shape memory alloys (2016, methodology): “%) due to their thermo-elastic phase change (Otsuka and Wayman, 1999; Johnson, 2013; Bel Haj Khalifa et al., 2013).”
A 3-D constitutive model for shape memory alloys incorporating pseudoelasticity and detwinning of self-accommodated martensite (2007, methodology): “When a shape memory alloy undergoes a martensitic phase transformation, it transforms from the parent phase to one or more of the different variants of the martensitic phase (Otsuka and Wayman, 1999).”
A robust model of pseudoelasticity in shape memory alloys (2013, positive): “Shape memory alloys (SMA) exhibit well-known spectacular effects (shape recovery, pseudoelasticity) associated with reversible martensitic phase transformation [1, 2].”
Meshworm: A Peristaltic Soft Robot With Antagonistic Nickel Titanium Coil Actuators (2013, methodology): “As the martensite state shear modulus, we used a third of the austenite shear modulus, which is the typical case for NiTi [21].”
Utilizing shape memory alloys to enhance the performance and safety of civil infrastructure: a review (2007, background): “Hesse et al. (2004) used martensite SMA (Ni–Ti) rings to repair loose bolted joints.”
Engineering design framework for a shape memory alloy coil spring actuator using a static two-state model (2012, methodology): “Others have used formulae from conventional coil spring design by changing the shear modulus for the austenite and martensite [4].”