Is the cerebellum a smith predictor?

By R. Miall, D. Weir, D. M. Wolpert, John F. Stein. 1993

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

An Incremental Self-Organizing Architecture for Sensorimotor Learning and Prediction (2017, background): “[8] proposed that the human cerebellum is capable of estimating the effects of a motor command through an internal action simulation and a prediction model.”
Re-evaluating circuit mechanisms underlying pattern separation (2019, neutral): “The evolutionarily conserved, highly regular structure of the cerebellar cortex has encouraged much speculation as to how the computations required for these functions are achieved (Figure 2A; Braitenberg, 1961; Eccles et al., 1967; Marr, 1969; Albus, 1971; Fujita, 1982; Pellionisz and Llinas, 1982;”
Multimodal integration in granule cells as a basis for associative plasticity and sensory prediction in a cerebellum-like circuit. (2010, background): “…evidence from clinical, human behavioral, theoretical, and physiological studies suggest a role for the cerebellum in predicting sensory inputs or states of the motor system (Bastian, 2006; Dean et al., 2002; Ebner and Pasalar, 2008; Miall et al., 1993; Paulin, 2005; Shadmehr and Krakauer, 2008).”
Dissociating the roles of the cerebellum and motor cortex during adaptive learning: the motor cortex retains what the cerebellum learns. (2011, background): “It has been suggested that the cerebellum forms a forward model predicting the sensory consequences of motor commands based on the current estimation of the state (Miall et al. 1993; Wolpert and Miall 1996; Shadmehr and Krakauer 2008).”
Predicting Away Robot Control Latency (2003, background): “It has been suggested that the cerebellum operates as a Smith Predictor to cancel the significant feedback delays in the human sensory system [7].”
Predictability is necessary for closed-loop visual feedback delay adaptation. (2014, background): “For instance, Miall et al. (1993) proposed that the human cerebellum might implement a Smith predictor, i.e., a forward model to estimate the effect of an issued motor command from internal simulation, combined with a separate circuit for feedback delay compensation.”
Cerebellar loops: A review of the nucleocortical pathway (2013, unknown): “Although speculative, nuclear output neurons that collateralize to project back to the cerebellar cortex could be a source of this type of efference copy or corollary discharge information, aiding the cerebellar cortex in monitoring ongoing cerebellar/motor output [51].”
From the perception of action to the understanding of intention (2001, background): “The forward model stores representations of sensory predictions associated with multiple action”
Short- and long-term changes in joint co-contraction associated with motor learning as revealed from surface EMG. (2002, background): “Under this hypothesis, the CNS learns internal models that simulate the dynamics of the musculoskeletal system and external environment and generates the required feedforward motor commands (Bizzi and Mussa-Ivaldi 1998; Kawato et al. 1987; Miall et al. 1993; Shidara et al. 1993).”
Touching a rubber hand: feeling of body ownership is associated with activity in multisensory brain areas (2005, background): “It has also been proposed that cerebellar mechanisms are involved in the distinction between self produced sensory signals and externally produced stimuli by detecting mismatches between the predicted sensory consequences of the voluntary movements and the actual sensory feedback (Wolpert and Ghahra”
Generating Coherent Patterns of Activity from Chaotic Neural Networks (2009, unknown): “The cerebellum has been proposed as a possible locus for such internal modeling (Miall et al., 1993).”
Please Scroll down for Article Connection Science Developmental Robotics: a Survey Developmental Robotics: a Survey (2003, unknown): “…idea that the brain forms so-called ‘internal forward models’—instances of internal models, which have been hypothesized to exist in the cerebellum (Miall et al. 1993), and whose biological and behavioural relevance has been conﬁrmed by recent experiments (e.g. Mussa-Ivaldi 1999, Wolpert et al.…”
The primate cortico-cerebellar system: anatomy and function (2006, background): “Many interrelated theoretical accounts have been developed that attempt to explain cerebellar contributions to motor control (for a review, see Ref”
Abnormalities in the awareness and control of action. (2000, background): “Such internal feedback of the estimated outcome of an action is available before the true sensory feedback (Miall et al. 1993).”
Hierarchical Control Using Networks Trained with Higher-Level Forward Models (2014, background): “A long-standing hypothesis is that the cerebellum implements a forward model that predicts the delayed sensory consequence of a motor command (Miall, Weir, Wolpert, & Stein, 1993; Shadmehr, Smith, & Krakauer, 2010).”
Forward models in visuomotor control. (2002, methodology): “3D), suggested by Miall et al. (1993).”
Inaugural Article: Forward estimation of movement state in posterior parietal cortex (2008, unknown): “Conversely, if PPC neurons were encoding an outgoing motor command, subsequent motor processing and execution of the movement would require at least 90 ms to produce the corresponding cursor motion, resulting in positive OLTs 90 ms (21).”