The pitfalls of cross-national survey research: A reply to the article by Spector et. al. on the psychometric properties of the Hofstede Values Survey Model 1994

By G. Hofstede. 2002

90 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cf2bb1bf243cbf622d8b447ed4c257001f6c6ad2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Do Cultural Differences Matter in Mergers and Acquisitions? A Tentative Model and Examination (2008, methodology): “Because research on the psychometric properties of Hofstede’s scales revealed poor internal consistencies (Spector et al. 2001), studies relying on the Hofstede scales or the Kogut and Singh (1988) index were corrected, using the scale reliabilities reported by Hofstede (2002).”
What you do depends on where you are: understanding how domestic and expatriate work requirements depend upon the cultural context (2007, methodology): “Although there has been a great deal of debate about these measures (Hofstede, 2002; Spector and Cooper, 2002), they have shown acceptable validity, and have been empirically supported and widely used (Dorfman and Howell, 1988; Shackleton and Ali, 1990; Elangovan, 1995; Peterson et al., 1995).”
The role of human, social, built, and natural capital in explaining life satisfaction at the country level: Toward a National Well-Being Index (NWI) (2006, background): “1991; Amrhein, 1995; Seligson, 2002; Handel, 1981; Hofstede, 2002; Schwartz, 1994).”
Examining the impact of Culture's consequences: a three-decade, multilevel, meta-analytic review of Hofstede's cultural value dimensions. (2010, background): “The controversy surrounding multilevel research can be traced back to Hofstede, who repeatedly warned scholars about the possibility of ecological fallacy when generalizing his findings and model across levels (e.g., Hofstede, 1995, 2001, 2002).”