Effect of culture system on the nutrition and growth performance of Pacific white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei (Boone) fed different diets

By A. Tacon, Jeff Cody, L. Conquest, S. Divakaran, I. Forster, O. Decamp. 2002

455 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Two 8-week feeding trials were conducted with juvenile Pacific white shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei (Boone) to compare the growth and performance of animals fed a series of experimental and commercial pelleted shrimp and fish feeds and dietary feeding regimes within an indoor running-water culture system and an outdoor zero-water-exchange culture system. The best overall shrimp growth performance was observed for animals fed the experimental shrimp diet and all-day feeding regime under outdoor zero-water-exchange culture conditions. Final body weight and average weekly growth rate under these conditions were 2.8 and 3.4 times greater, respectively, than animals of similar size fed with the same diet under indoor running-water culture conditions. Although direct comparison between indoor and outdoor culture systems is difficult because of the lower indoor water temperatures, and consequently lower mean daily feed intake of animals, it is believed that the higher growth and feed performance of animals reared under outdoor `green-water' culture conditions was primarily due to their ability to obtain additional nutrients from food organisms endogenously produced within the zero-water-exchange culture system. The most promising features of zero-water-exchange culture systems are that they offer increased biosecurity, reduced feed costs and water use for the farmer, and by doing so provide a potential avenue of moving the shrimp culture industry along a path of greater sustainability and environmental compatibility.

Subfields: Aquatic Science, Ecology, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cf0d3557c29c3bba2438420f669b69bfe3b6f108

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Aquatic Science

  1. Wilson Wasielesky
  2. M. Emerenciano
  3. L. H. Poersch
  4. J. Ekasari
  5. M. Martínez‐Porchas
  6. R. Crab
  7. R. Cavalli
  8. W. Verstraete

In Ecology

  1. Wilson Wasielesky
  2. D. Davis
  3. M. Martínez‐Porchas
  4. L. H. Poersch
  5. A. Tacon
  6. Katherine A. Sloman
  7. M. Emerenciano
  8. W. Verstraete

In Global and Planetary Change

  1. Wilson Wasielesky
  2. M. Metian
  3. A. Tacon
  4. A. Neori
  5. M. Hasan
  6. J. Ekasari
  7. D. Davis
  8. W. Verstraete

Citations in the corpus