Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications
By Omkarprasad S. Vaidya, Sushil Kumar. European Journal of Operational Research, 2006
3,790 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Control and Systems Engineering, Management of Technology and Innovation, Management Science and Operations Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ce551b00f5c5539fb586b599727ade235dbc4e50
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Control and Systems Engineering
- Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas
- Alessio Ishizaka
- Ashraf Labib
- Abbas Mardani
- Ahmad Jusoh
- Kannan Govindan
- Stefan Schinke
- Wolfgang Ossadnik
In Management of Technology and Innovation
- Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas
- Alessio Ishizaka
- Ashraf Labib
- Kannan Govindan
- Abbas Mardani
- Martin Brandt Jepsen
- Ahmad Jusoh
- Stefan Schinke
In Management Science and Operations Research
- Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas
- Alessio Ishizaka
- Abbas Mardani
- Ashraf Labib
- Kannan Govindan
- Ahmad Jusoh
- Martin Brandt Jepsen
- Khalil Md Nor
Citations in the corpus
- Analytic Hierarchy Process and Expert Choice: Benefits and limitations (2009, background): “Several papers have compiled the AHP success stories in very different fields (Zahedi, 1986; Golden et al , 1989; Shim, 1989; Vargas, 1990; Saaty and Forman, 1992; Forman and Gass, 2001; Kumar and Vaidya, 2006; Omkarprasad and Sushil, 2006; Ho, 2008; Liberatore and Nydick, 2008).”
- Pressure analysis for green supply chain management implementation in Indian industries using analytic hierarchy process (2014, methodology): “AHP from invention has been a tool in the hands of decision-makers and researchers, and it is a widely used multiple criteria decision-making tool (Omkarprasad and Kumar 2006).”
- Performance evaluation of Turkish cement firms with fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and TOPSIS methods (2009, methodology): “Analytic Hierarchy Process, since its invention , has been a tool at the hands of decision makers and researchers; and it is one of the most widely used multiple criteria decision-making tools (Vaidya & Kumar, 2006).”
- CLUSTERS AND PIVOTS FOR EVALUATING A LARGE NUMBER OF ALTERNATIVES IN AHP (2012, neutral): “…been applied successfully on numerous occasions: see for example the reviews (Zahedi, 1986; Golden & Wasil et al., 1989; Shim, 1989; Vargas, 1990; Saaty & Forman, 1992; Forman & Gass, 2001; Kumar & Vaidya, 2006; Omkarprasad & Sushil, 2006; Ho, 2008; Liberatore & Nydick, 2008; Sipahi & Timor, 2010).”
- Big data analytics in logistics and supply chain management: Certain investigations for research and applications (2016, positive): “Each sub-problem is a single objective decision making problem that can be solved quite easily (Vaidya and Kumar, 2006; Ho, 2008; Ho et al., 2012; Subramanian and Ramanathan, 2012; Rajesha and Malligab, 2013).”
- A fuzzy AHP approach to personnel selection problem (2009, methodology): “A good review is given by Vaidya and Kumar [21] about the applications of AHP.”
- Group Aggregation Techniques for Analytic Hierarchy Process and Analytic Network Process: A Comparative Analysis (2016, methodology): “For underpinning the findings of past bibliometric investigations (see e.g. Vaidya and Kumar 2006; Ho 2008; Sipahi and Timor 2010; Hülle et al. 2013), we perform a comprehensive bibliometric study (see e.g. Van Raan 2003; White 2004; Jarneving 2005) for this paper in order to highlight the ongoing…”
- Multiple criteria decision-making techniques and their applications – a review of the literature from 2000 to 2014 (2015, methodology): “Several studies (Behzadian, Kazemzadeh, Albadvi, & Aghdasi, 2010; Ho, 2008; Vaidya & Kumar, 2006) have demonstrated the vitality of the field and reported several methods proposed in the literature.”