Stepping off the pendulum: Why only an action-based approach can transcend the nativist–empiricist debate

By Jedediah W. P. Allen, Mark H. Bickhard. 2013

108 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ce0a94c82b718101623fdb15857ec7fb8a4ab950

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

1. Dor Abrahamson

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. Dragan Trninic
2. Dor Abrahamson
3. Daniel D. Hutto
4. Michael D. Kirchhoff

In Statistics and Probability

1. Dor Abrahamson

Citations in the corpus

• Bringing forth mathematical concepts: signifying sensorimotor enactment in fields of promoted action (2014, background): “Meanwhile, alternative accounts of human behavior are being put forth that do away entirely with the assumption of mental content, including philosophers of cognitive science offering radical theory of embodiment (Chemero 2009; Hutto 2013) and cognitive developmental empiricists offering an action-o”