The eyes have it: An eye-movement study into the processing of formulaic sequences

By G. Underwood, N. Schmitt, Adam Galpin. 2004

201 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Genetics, Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cde0d2a2c060bd7b00479700707934a435d6905d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Genetics

1. Kathy Conklin
2. Wei Chen
3. Tatiana Nekrasova
4. A. Siyanova‐Chanturia
5. N. Schmitt

In Ophthalmology

1. Kathy Conklin
2. Wei Chen
3. Tatiana Nekrasova
4. A. Siyanova‐Chanturia
5. N. Schmitt

In Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

1. Kathy Conklin
2. Wei Chen
3. Tatiana Nekrasova
4. A. Siyanova‐Chanturia
5. N. Schmitt

Citations in the corpus

• The idiom principle revisited (2014, background): “In one of the first such studies, Underwood et al. (2004) investigated idiom comprehension in L1 and L2.”
• The Processing of Formulaic Sequences by Second Language Speakers. (2007, methodology): “For example, Schmitt, Grandage, et al. (2004), Underwood et al. (2004), and Schmitt and Underwood (2004) employed a number of test items that either were not typically considered formulaic sequences or were unknown to the participants.”
• Formulaic sequences and perceived oral proficiency: putting a Lexical Approach to the test (2006, background): “…experiments suggest that what appears to qualify as a formulaic sequence to a native speaker may be less likely to qualify as such for a non-native learner who still seems to process the given sequence in a word-for-word fashion (Schmitt and Underwood, 2004; Underwood et al., 2004).”
• More than words: Frequency effects for multi-word phrases (2010, background): “Underwood, Schmitt, and Galpin (2004) used eye-tracking to look at participants’ eye-movements while reading formulaic sequences of up to six words.”
• Formulaic Sequences: Are They Processed More Quickly than Nonformulaic Language by Native and Nonnative Speakers? (2008, methodology): “For example, Underwood et al. (2004) showed processing advantages for terminal words in a sequence, but studies looking at the processing behavior of complete sequences are also needed.”
• Adding more fuel to the fire: An eye-tracking study of idiom processing by native and non-native speakers (2011, methodology): “Our non-native speaker results seem to be in agreement with those reported in Underwood et al. (2004).”